Current Events

I Blew The Whistle On Diebold

diebold

I found myself presented with a difficult dilemma.


I have a great respect and appreciation for how important attorney-client privilege is… at the same time, I also have a great respect and appreciation for clean elections, and for the will of the people, via their vote, to determine who will be their government. '
Stephen Heller
Date Posted: 07/04/08
Reader Rating: rating

Editor's Note: Stephen Heller became known to legions of election protection activists as the Diebold whistle-blower in January, 2004. While working as a word processor at the law firm representing Diebold, Heller saw documents proving Diebold was violating state election laws. Faced with a difficult moral dilemma, Heller chose to release the documents to the press and California's Secretary of State and is now on probation for his crime. In this case, what is illegal is not always wrong; here is his story.

I was working as a legal word processor at a law firm in Los Angeles, which unbeknownst to me when I started temping there, represented Diebold Election Systems in California. In late January in 2004, as part of my job as a word processor, I saw some documents about Diebold that were full of smoking gun, irrefutable proof that Diebold was using and was planning to continue to use illegal, uncertified software in their California voting machines.

This presented me with a very difficult dilemma. Attorney-client privilege is a very important part of our justice system; the right of attorneys and clients to communicate in secret and the right of attorneys to create documents and other material in service to their client and keep that material secret is very important; to breach that is a serious crime. I have a great respect and appreciation for how important attorney-client privilege is… at the same time, I also have a great respect and appreciation for clean elections, and for the will of the people, via their vote, to determine who will be their government.

I had to choose between breaking attorney-client privilege and helping to protect my entire republic, or keeping my mouth shut and respecting Diebold’s right to have secret and private communications with their attorneys. The choice I made was to steal the documents and expose them. I gave them to Bev Harris of Black Box Voting, and Bev sent them to the press and to the California Secretary of State.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 next








Tags:

Comments

Diebold, Choice Point & Blackwater : Privitazed Republic

By WhiteNoise, July 7, 2008 at 18:03

"If voting could change the system, it would be illegal." - Theodore Adorno

I originally thought that quote was soooo cynic (yes I once was an yank idealist ;) but as Greg Palast has been "hinting" all along, the violation of voting rights is a sad American reality only equaled by a quote by this Karl Rove precursor... "It's quite enough that people know that an election was held. People who vote decide of nothing. People who count the vote decide everything ! - Joseph Staline

So what's wrong with the privatization of democracy ?

LYNCHING BY LAPTOP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCR6IdTQTeE

Just a hint : Before you export democracy, try having it at home !

Editor's Picks

Darfur Refugees: Don't Press-Gang Our Sons

By Citizen Correspondent Anna Schmitt
Through my humanitarian work in Central Africa, I learned that refugee children from... Full Story »