In a transparent attempt to make an issue out of a non-issue, the Clinton campaign is leveling charges of plagiarism against Obama based on a speech he made. For those who aren’t already familiar with the context, here are the facts. Obama, upon the advice of his friend Deval Patrick (Governor of Massachusetts), used a similar appeal to one that Patrick himself used in a speech in 2006. Here is the text of both passages:
Patrick’s 2006 Speech:
“I hear it a lot… that all I have to offer is words, just words. ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident,’ just words? Just words? ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself.’ Just words? ‘Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.’ Just words? ‘I have a dream’-- just words?"
Obama’s Speech:
”Don’t tell me words don’t matter. 'I have a dream’— just words? ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal’ — just words? ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself’ — just words? Just speeches?”
Now, the first thing to note is that both men are quoting third parties, and neither is claiming that the words are their own. Everyone knows who first uttered the phrases “I have a dream”, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”, and “We have nothing to fear but fear itself”. Neither Patrick nor Obama originated these words, and neither of them presented the words as if they were their own. So, what is left?
There are two words left in common between the two speeches – “just words” – and these two words make up the sum total of the alleged plagiarism. What was Obama supposed to say?




Comments
Re: The Desperate And Pathetic Clinton Attack Machine
By luyen, February 21, 2008 at 11:43I hope we don't lose sight that Clinton OR Obama will still be better than Bush and his cronies in office - the republicans' greatest strength is that the Democrats can never get as well organized, and they're good at fear-mongering.
In terms of methodology, Clinton is old school, that's how they did politics back then, while Obama is more of a forward-thinker, but that doesn't necessarily mean Obama will make a better leader, for the simple reason that the political infrastructure is run the old-school way, not the new school way.
It's great and preferably to do positive-politicking a la Obama, but will it lead to real institutional change? I really hope so, but it might not be realistic to think so.
Re: The Desperate And Pathetic Clinton Attack Machine
By aftaab, February 21, 2008 at 09:56Great article! I'm sure we will see even more desperate tactics from the Clintons over the few weeks ...
Re: The Desperate And Pathetic Clinton Attack Machine
By nickvulture, February 19, 2008 at 10:43that's a rad little article, good research...i'm a big obama fan, i hope he takes wisconsin and hawaii today man!