Fight For The Freedom Of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

Submitted by Paul Sullivan on June 23, 2008 | Comments (9)

There’s a video on the site that is having a strange impact on me. It’s a “shoe-is-on-the-other-foot” kind of feeling and I don’t like it.

The video promotes a documentary called Expelled: The Intelligent Design School Of Thought. It is narrated by Ben Stein, who famously played the laconic economics teacher in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, renowned by slackers of a certain age.

If I’m being honest, and that’s what I’m trying to be here, I don’t think it’s really a documentary at all, at least according to the Random House Dictionary definition, which is: “based on or re-creating an actual event, era, life story, etc., that purports to be factually accurate and contains no fictional elements: a documentary life of Gandhi.”

I think “Expelled” is really propaganda, which is defined so: “information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.”

“Expelled” is a Michael Moore kind of documentary, in which the filmmakers try to persuade you with what looks like the truth but is really a skillfully composed argument promoting their side of the story, leaving out a lot of information that weakens their argument. And in this case, good old Ben Stein serves as the front man – he’s a nice unassuming guy, the kind of guy you can trust, right?

The point of “Expelled” is this: many people, including many scientists, believe that life, nature and the universe must be the product of an intelligent designer – God or some super-intelligent godlike being – because Darwin’s mechanism of natural selection just doesn’t cut the mustard, or explain the intricacies of the mustard on its own.

And the real point of “Expelled” is that the mainstream scientific community is persecuting scientists who believe in intelligent design. I’ve only seen the trailer so far, but I recognize many of the figures as people I consider to be stooges of the intelligent design movement. And I expect that when the film is released here this week, and I go and see it, all the usual intelligent design friends and foes will be featured.

I’m also sure I’ll see the eminent biologist Richard Dawkins, who is public enemy number one as far as the intelligent design forces are concerned, condemn the whole gang as a threat to science and freedom of thought.

But wait a minute.

That’s what these intelligent design advocates are worried about in “Expelled”! In a very clever way, they’re turning the freedom of thought argument around and using it to their own advantage. Condemned by the science community as fundamentalist luddites and right-wing reactionaries, the forces of intelligent design now argue that mainstream science, the science of Darwin and natural selection, is trying to suppress their freedom of thought.

"What are you guys so worried about?" they ask. "Is there something wrong with your Darwin that makes you sensitive to competition and criticism?" This is much the same argument that Dawkins et al have used to fight back what they see as the threat – the religious right’s effort to teach intelligent design in schools, which they see as a thinly veiled attempt to squelch real science because it inevitably leads impressionable minds to question the existence of God.

What's going on here is no less than the battle of the Enlightenment versus the Reformation in a 21st century context. For the Enlightenment, you have Darwin, who – in my opinion – proves that natural selection is the means by which human beings have acquired minds to reflect on the nature of their own existence, versus the forces of religion who want everyone to believe in a Cosmic Dad and the conclusion that follows: when you die, it’s not all over.

That’s what all this is about, really. The fond hope or wish that we’re not like all the creatures we devour and destroy thoughtlessly day in, day out, in our ravenous quest to stay alive ourselves. That for us, there’s life after death and the welcoming arms of our Cosmic Dad.

Well, I choose to believe, nice as that thought is, there’s no actual evidence for it, so if it turns out to be true, terrific, but that should not prevent us from trying to find out what’s really going on. Fairy tales are nice, but not in science class. If Ferris Bueller believes in intelligent design, he must have skipped science class.

But what Ben Stein is saying in “Expelled” is that Darwin’s army has become so powerful, the shoe is on the other foot. Darwinists, who despite all their whining about persecution, actually control the system and are now persecuting the advocates of intelligent design, and they can’t think out loud or publish without perishing. The oppressed, once again, has become the oppressor. If you're a Darwinist and you want to see the enemy, look in the mirror.

For someone who believes in enlightenment, that is a very disturbing idea. At the end of the trailer, Ben Stein warns us that the very act of viewing “Expelled” could be dangerous. Educators and scientists could lose their jobs. I hope that’s just scare-mongering, but I suspect he at least has cause for concern. The irony is itself cosmic: at least since Galileo was persecuted for reporting what he saw with his own eyes, that the planets revolve around the sun – and that the whole universe does not revolve around the planet Earth – religion has installed itself as the Divine Censor. Now, it seems, there’s a secular sheriff in town.

So I’ll see Expelled, and I’ll defend the intelligent designers’ right to produce propaganda, or whatever they call it. Because it doesn’t matter if they are wrong. Or even if they are the opposite of intelligent, i.e.: stupid. You have the right to be wrong-headed; you have the right to be stupid. And as long as your recognize my right to be stupid, too, we’re going to be okay.

Because that’s how we learn. We learn through trial and error. We learn by asking questions, and it doesn’t matter how upsetting those questions are. We learn if we have the freedom to learn. Freedom to think and freedom to talk about it.

And that’s what Orato.com is all about. Think what you want. And say what you want. Just respect the rights of others to do the same.


Comments

Re: Fight For The Freedom Of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By luyen, June 24, 2008 at 21:53

How can Ben Stein be taken seriously after hosting a terrible game show called "Take Ben Stein's Money?" It's just wrong!

Re: Fight For The Freedom Of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By Melkor, June 25, 2008 at 09:34

Hey man, I liked that show. But I think it was called "Win Ben Stein's Money".

To be as truthful as I can be, I think any dogmatic position is one to be avoided. Did God make the universe? A cosmic explosion/accident? I wasn't there, and neither was anyone else around today, so the empirical/scientific method is out the window, and blind faith really moves us backwards. I think the Buddha has this one right; when asked regarding the 'first cause', he remained silent (as he did with all metephysical questions - no I'm not a Buddhist).

However, slavery is wrong, no matter what the bible says. This is my belief. And scientists can't tell me if milk is good for me or not. Milk for crying out loud - I assume the chocolate kind is bad, but who knows, certainly not anyone who tries to study this stuff evidently.

Science has certainly played it's role in taking human life on an unimaginable scale; not so different than the dogmatic religious elite. And both have offered humanity many positive things also, this is undeniable. It is a mistake in my opinion to dismiss either out of hand.

Re: Fight For The Freedom Of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By Heather Wallace, June 25, 2008 at 09:47

I'm with you Melkor, but milk probably is bad...all those injected hormones? Then again, that's science/industry's fault...

Re: Fight for the Freedom of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By wyattmcintyre, June 24, 2008 at 06:01

A point well taken and well put Paul. The basic and fundamental tenant of Freedom of speech is not in how you utilize it yourself but how you preserve and protect, how you stand up from the rights of others to have theirs.

I am not going to go into my views on religion and faith, I have them and I count myself blessed for having a faith. That isn't the point of all of this, nor is it my objective to get into an argument or a discussion about it, even as the person who commented before me tries to turn it into that.

What I am going to say is that I got started here a few weeks ago and I have been enjoying my experience on the site. A short time after I got started I sat down to read an article on here, making a point in a particularly crass sort of way I was disturbed to see it littered with 9/11 truth references. I personally find that reprehensible and I sat back and considered whether this site was actually for me. But as I thought about it, the more I just found myself thinking, what am I? An idiot. First off I choose to click on the article and I choose to keep reading it, that was me exerting my own free choice. If I didn't want to continue I didn't have to go and I didn't have to keep on reading. Secondly there are people out there who hold my opinions in less than the highest esteem and they have told me so in rather colorful language.

The point is firstly that no one forces us to read these articles or watch these documentaries. If we don't want to then click away, or don't spend the money watching the movie or whatever else it may be. Don't sit there, go through it all and walk away with your blood boiling and then pretty much say to yourself well I exercised my free choice I am going to now go out and try to take away other peoples rights to do the same thing. Secondly the more we go after others for their freedom of expression the more we pave the road for others to come after us later if we say something they don't like. The slow erosion of freedom never stops until it's a hole big enough to bury us all in.

Re: Fight for the Freedom of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By johnhatch, June 24, 2008 at 11:56

I'm sorry, but I think faith is the point. No one is questioning your right to believe in Jesus, Santa, or the Tooth Fairy, but what is questioned is the supposition that faith is as valid as the scientific method, or that faith can be combined with politics and public policy.

The problem is that when that happens, you end up with a public education system that teaches obvious absurdities such as that the Earth was created in 6 days roughly 6,000 years ago, that mankind walked with dinosaurs, that the bible is literally true, and on and on. It's an insult to human intelligence, which a person of faith must believe is a gift from God.

In America, kids are being told that abstinance is the only way to avoid pregnancy and STDs, with disastrous results. This is due to the same blinkered religious views that allow military recruiters into schools and even make student home numbers available to help further a 'Crusade' ('Our God is stronger than Allah'- General Boykin) based on racism, greed, and lies in which a million Iraqis have been slaughtered along with 4100 Americans.

You insist on equal time for fairy tales, while finding it 'reprehensible' that people seek the truth about 9/11. I defy you to honestly evaluate the evidence that's available (a lot of it was immediately destroyed, withheld, or ignored) and come to the conclusion that the Bush Administration wasn't at the very least complicit in the 'new Pearl harbor event' they so hoped for in order to advance their plans for world domination. If you're honest, you won't be able to. Sometimes the truth is uncomfortable. Why not?

The truth is larger than any of us. If you just pick and choose what you wish to believe based on convenience and feeling better, that's fine, but it doesn't make you informed. If I chose to worship the Easter Bunny, would you respect my views and seek my opinions?

For all their Catholic assaults on science and reason over two millenia, from villifying Copernicus to seeing the devil under every bed, still, when the Pope flies, it's not holy water that fuels the jet engines. If he gets sick, he doesn't see a faith healer. To debase science is to deny human intelligence and human potential. To live by 'faith' is to inhabit a dream world. I think Nietzsche got it about right. Sorry.

Re: Fight for the Freedom of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By wyattmcintyre, June 24, 2008 at 19:11

Thanks for the reply John but I am not going to engage in this conversation with you, but I will say enjoy your beliefs, you have every right to believe whatever it is that you want free of my ridicule or my attempts to belittle them. Obviously the level of courtesy is not necessarily agreed upon as you take up your cause with your own degree of zealousness.

I will agree with you in one sense, horrendous things happened in the name of faith, just as horrendous things happened at the hands of atheists.

Perhaps I indulge in a "dream world", if that is the case then I am happy to do so, my faith and my belief in something beyond myself got me past hard times and in that I owe it something more than just to abandon it because you said, oh people, there were bad people who did bad things. Please do keep quoting Neitzsche, nothing bad happened when people took his reasoning too far.

Re: Fight for the Freedom of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By johnhatch, June 25, 2008 at 01:11

Thanks, Mr. McIntyre, but you entered the discussion of your own free will.
Ideas are exchanged here, even uncomfortable ones. There was no ridicule in my comments. As I'm sure you know the 'reductio ad absurdem' argument was employed by people as early as Socrates. It has an honorable history in pointing out faulty logic. No disrspect. There is illusion, but no magic.

Now, either we believe in science and the scientific method, or we don't. If we do, then people don't walk on water. Nobody. Nobody at all. Not even you., in your imaginanation. there is illusion, but no magiic.

Science and gravity works every time. It's why we're alive. If thelloaves and fishes happened two thousand years ago or now, instead of magical thinking, perhaps we could be applying ourselves to preventing the two million or so child deaths per year that occur due to starvation. II we believe in the laws of physics, then the World Trade Center buildings could not have fallen the way the US government claims. Life and logic are magic enough without having to resort to fantasy, no matter how attractive, no matter what happens. The laws of nature are immutable, as are the laws of logic, which can be ignored at the expense of a break from reality. That's insanity'

I don't 'enjoy' my beliefs. I hold to certain things which can be demonstrated to be true, and reasonable wihin dictates of logic and what we know. Not what we might like. Some of my beliefs are very unenjoyable, but perhaps necessary. i don't understand how modern people can be so indifferent to the lives of their own chidren or grandchildren. It's unbelievalble.

Finally, I'd like to refer you to the writings of the venerable Professor Walter Kaufmann, the pre-eminent world authority on the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche's intellectual life ended approximately twenty years before his death in 1900. So to hold him responsible for the atrocities of Hitler roughly sixty years later is a bit absurbd.. For one thing, he ridiculed Prussian militarism. Look it up. He said that the only Christian died on a cross. He admired Christ, but had only contempt for 'followers' who created convenient myths and self-serving madness while imperiling humanity itself. Now global warming is probably irreversible while we talk about 'clean coal'. In America, government officials with responsibility for the environment endorse further degradation while finding consolation that Armageddon will soon occur (they hope for nuclear war in the Mideast, and push for a spurious attack on Iran)

To make a case against Nietzsche is to invite a much more reasonable and timely indictment of American born-again Christians and their meglocidal innvasion in Afghanistan and Iraq. Jesus couldn't walk on water. or shoot gun. Stop the killing. The madness. Stop'

Re: Fight for the Freedom of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By johnhatch, June 25, 2008 at 00:10

Thanks, Mr. McIntyre, but you entered the discussion of your own free will. I

deas are exchanged here, even uncomfortable ones. There was no ridicule in my comments. As I'm sure you know the 'reductio ad absurdem' was employed by people as early as Socrates. It has an honorable history in pointing out faulty logic.

Now, either we believe in science and the scientific method, or we don't. If we do, then people don't walk on water. Nobody. Nobody at all.

Maybe that''s an faith. Gravity works every time. It's why we're alive. If thel loaves and fishes hve happened two thousand years ago or now, instead of magical thinking, perhaps we could be applying ourselves to preventing the two million or so child deaths per year that occur due to starvation. If we believe in the laws of physics, then the World Trade Center buildings could not have fallen the way the US government claims. Life and logic are magic enough without having to resort to fantasy, no matter how attractive, no matter what happens. The laws of nature are immutable, as are the laws of logic, which can be ignored at the expense of a break from reality.

I don't 'enjoy' my beliefs. I hold to certain things which can be demonstrated to be true, and reasonable wihin dictates of logic and what we know. Not what we might like. Some of my beliefs are very unenjoyable, but perhaps necessary.

Finally, I'd like to refer you to the writings of the venerable Professor Walter Kaufmann, the pre-eminent world authority on the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche's intellectual life ended approximately twenty years before his death in 1900. So to hold him responsible for the atrocities of Hitler roughly sixty years later is a bit of a stretch. For one thing, he ridiculed militarism. Look it up. He said that the only Christian died on a cross. He admired Christ, but had only contempt for 'followers' who created convenient myths and self-serving madness while imperiling humanity itself. Now global warming is probably irreversible while we talk about 'clean coal'. In America, government officials with responsibility for the environment endorse further degradation while finding consolation that Armageddon will soon occur (they hope for nuclear war in the Mideast, and push for an spurious attack on Iran)

To make a case against Nietzsche is to invite a much more reasonable and timely indictment of born-again Christians and their meglocidal invasion in Afghanistan and Iraq. Jesus couldn't walk on water. But surely enough torture and killing has been carried out in his name.

Re: Fight for the Freedom of Other Peoples’ Stupid Ideas

By johnhatch, June 23, 2008 at 12:13

I had the same reaction as Paul.

If Darwinism is imperfect in explaining evolution, it's because it is as yet incomplete. No one is saying that life is not vastly complicated, or easy to understand.

Darwinism represents our best scientific efforts to understand. 'Intelligent Design' is just a fancy term for Creationism. They want you to believe that the Earth is less than 6,000 years old, that the Grand Canyon was carved by the Great Flood, and that Noah had dinosaurs on the Ark. Others want you to believe that t'he devil planted certifiably ancient artifacts to cause confusion and doubt. Intelligent design is the science of the Dark Ages.

A phenomonon exists amongst radical neo-Christians which I call 'persecution chic'. It aggrandizes their importance in their own eyes to suggest that 'the world is against us'. I doubt that Creationists are persecuted, unless contempt for dumb and baseless ideas is taken as persecution. As for academics, there are standards one is expected to meet. Superstition is not science, and science represents our best effort to learn the truth. Neitzsche called Christianity (and by extension Creationism) 'voluntary stupidity'. People are free to be as 'stupid' as they like, but not to pass it off as truth. Persecution? How delusionally self-indulgent.

Check out 'With God on Their Side' by Esther Kaplan, a book which explores the damage done to the world by the anti-science logic-defying crocodile Christians appointed to every board, committee and decision-making body in the Bush Administration.They feel persecuted also, but they are responsible for countless deaths in Africa for taking an 'Intelligent Design' approach to Aids, to cite just one example. They are in a fight to the death (perhaps of us all) against sanity, reasonableness, and logic. Science.

The human race has survived thus far because we're (relatively) smart. Superstition is not smart, and serves no purpose.